Publisher's Synopsis
<p> By presenting police process in procedural order <b>Criminal Procedure: The Constitution and the Police</b> gives students a sense of the theoretical flow and logic of law enforcement. Charts and illustrations graphically demonstrate legal standards and concepts. Examples start out easy, to build students’ confidence, and gradually become more challenging, to test students’ knowledge and analytical skills. </p> <p> The<b> Seventh Edition </b>incorporates new Supreme Court Cases: <i>United States v. Jones</i> (the relationship of modern technology―GPS―with the Fourth Amendment), <i>Howes v. Field</i> and <i>J.D.B. v. North Carolina </i> (implicating the Miranda doctrine), <i>Perry v. New Hampshire</i> (the first case in over thirty years involving eyewitness identification), <i>Florence v. Burlington</i>, <i>Arizona v. United States</i>, <i>Messerschmidt v. Millender</i> , and <i>Davis v. North Carolina</i>. In addition, lower court cases have been added to reflect trends and changes in the law, and problems have been revised. </p> <p> <b>Features:</b> </p> <ul> <li> presents police process in <b>procedural order</b> <ul> <li> gives students a sense of the theoretical flow and logic of law enforcement </li> </ul> </li> <li> <b>charts and illustrations </b>graphically demonstrate legal standards and concepts </li> <li> <b>examples start out easy,</b> to build confidence, and <b>gradually become more challenging, </b>to test knowledge and analytical skills </li> </ul> <p> <b>Thoroughly updated, the revised Seventh Edition presents:</b> </p> <ul> <li> new Supreme Court cases <ul> <li> United States v. Jones (the relationship of modern technology―GPS―with the Fourth Amendment) </li> <li> Howes v. Field and J.D.B. v. North Carolina (implicating the Miranda doctrine) </li> <li> Perry v. New Hampshire (the first case in over thirty years involving eyewitness identification) </li> <li> Florence v. Burlington o Arizona v. United States </li> <li> Messerschmidt v. Millender o Davis v. North Carolina </li> </ul> </li> <li> revised problems </li> <li> lower court cases added to reflect trends and changes in the law </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
